Business profile & competitive position
Consolidated Edison, Inc. operates in the Utilities sector under the Regulated Electric industry classification. Its core business is the transmission and distribution of electricity to the New York City metropolitan area, plus regulated gas and steam operations, which gives it a regional, vertically integrated utility footprint. Because customers in its franchise territory have little choice of provider, the company functions essentially as a legal monopoly whose revenues are governed by rate cases and tariffs rather than competitive pricing.
The economics of that structure show up clearly in the reported profitability metrics. Con Ed's 12.5% net margin and 8.9% return on equity are not eye-popping, but they are consistent with a regulated cost-of-service model where regulators intentionally cap returns to keep customer bills affordable. The ROE under 10% suggests the company is earning an allowed equity return near the lower end of typical utility ranges, while the margin indicates solid operational cost control rather than pricing power. Combined with a beta of 0.26, these figures point to a low-volatility, capital-intensive franchise whose moat is rooted in its physical infrastructure and regulatory franchise rather than brand or technology.
Financial posture
Con Ed currently carries a $39.8 billion market cap and trades at a P/E of 17.7. With the stock at $107.98, roughly in line with trailing fundamental multiples for large, investment-grade utilities, the valuation reflects stability rather than growth. The 12.5% net margin and 8.9% ROE reinforce the profile of a regulated cash-flow generator, while the 0.26 beta explains why the stock typically moves much less than the broad market.
On a short-term technical snapshot, ED sits at RSI 41.8 and just below its 50-day EMA of $109.91. Neither reading is extreme, so the tape looks relatively neutral. For income-oriented investors, the combination of a mid-teen multiple and a low beta usually points to a bond-proxy-like stock whose performance is closely tied to interest-rate expectations and the regulated allowed return on equity.
Macro & geopolitical exposure
Because Con Ed is a Regulated Electric utility, its exposures are dominated by the mechanics of public-utility regulation rather than by the business cycle. State-level decisions by the New York Public Service Commission influence allowed rates of return, revenue decoupling mechanisms, and cost-recovery timing. As a result, the company's ability to earn or grow its 8.9% ROE depends partly on how regulators balance customer affordability against needed grid investment.
Beyond regulation, the regulated-electric model also creates exposure to interest-rate levels. Utilities are capital-intensive and typically carry meaningful debt; higher rates raise borrowing costs and can compress relative valuations for low-beta equities. Capital spending on grid modernization and climate resilience is another factor: transformer supply chains, labor inflation, and equipment availability can all affect project timing and cost. Commodity price swings matter less than for competitive power generators because fuel and purchased-power costs are usually passed through via fuel-adjustment clauses, though they can still drive short-term working-capital needs. Clean-energy mandates and federal or state carbon rules are also relevant, since they influence capital allocation toward electrification, storage, and grid hardening.
Recent developments
The most recent news cluster centers on Con Ed's second-quarter 2026 results. On August 6, 2026, Zacks reported that "Consolidated Edison (ED) Q2 Earnings and Revenues Beat Estimates," while The Wall Street Journal noted that the company "Reports Higher Profit, Revenue." A day later, on August 7, 2026, Zacks followed with "Consolidated Edison Q2 Earnings Top Estimates, Revenues Rise Y/Y."
The numbers behind those headlines were solid: for the quarter reported August 6, 2026, Con Ed delivered actual EPS of $0.83 against an estimate of $0.756, a 9.8% positive surprise. Yet the immediate price reaction was not strongly bullish. The stock fell 0.89% the next day and recorded a null% five-day drift, which illustrates how even headline "beats" can be priced in or offset by broader utility-sector dynamics.
Earnings behavior & post-earnings drift
Con Ed has a strong recent earnings record. Over the last eight reported quarters, the company has beaten expectations 7 out of 8 times, or 88%, with an average earnings surprise of 3.9%. Over the same window, the average five-day post-earnings move has been 1.25% to the upside, classified as an "up" drift. That suggests that, on average, positive earnings news has tended to carry the stock mildly higher once the dust settles.
The last four quarters, however, show more variation than the averages imply. The November 6, 2025 report produced a robust reaction: a 1.58% next-day gain and a 4.08% five-day drift after a 9.2% EPS beat. By contrast, the February 19, 2026 quarter beat estimates by 4% but the stock fell 1.89% the next day and drifted 1.04% lower over the following week. The May 7, 2026 quarter was the lone miss of the four, at 4.8% below estimates, yet the stock was barely changed the next day and drifted up 0.7% over five sessions. The most recent report continues the pattern of "beat but fade," with the immediate move slightly negative. Looking ahead, the next scheduled release is October 29, 2026 after the close, with a current consensus EPS estimate of $2.04.
Frequently Asked Questions
How consistent is Consolidated Edison's earnings record?
Over the last eight quarters, ED has beaten the official consensus 7 of 8 times, or 88%, with an average surprise of 3.9%. The most recent quarter, reported August 6, 2026, delivered EPS of $0.83 versus the estimate of $0.756, a 9.8% beat.
How has ED stock traded after its recent earnings reports?
The average five-day post-earnings drift over the last eight quarters is 1.25% upward. The November 2025 beat produced a 4.08% five-day drift, while the most recent August 2026 beat showed a null% five-day drift and a -0.89% next-day move, demonstrating that beats do not guarantee short-term gains.
What macro factors most affect a regulated electric utility like Con Ed?
Key exposures include state and federal regulation, interest rates that affect cost of capital and relative valuation, authorized ROEs, grid-investment needs, supply-chain costs for equipment and labor, climate-related resilience spending, and fuel or purchased-power pass-through mechanisms. Currency risk is generally minimal because revenue is domestic.
For a deeper dive into Consolidated Edison, including how institutional analysts are modeling rate-case outcomes, dividend coverage, and the upcoming October 29, 2026 earnings report, see the full institutional verdict on the ticker page.
| Reported | Actual | Estimate | Surprise | 1D Move | 5D Move |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-06 | $0.83 | $0.756 | +9.8% | -0.89% | null% |
| 2026-05-07 | $2.17 | $2.28 | -4.8% | -0.08% | +0.7% |
| 2026-02-19 | $0.89 | $0.856 | +4% | -1.89% | -1.04% |
| 2025-11-06 | $1.9 | $1.74 | +9.2% | +1.58% | +4.08% |
| 2025-08-07 | $0.67 | $0.641 | +4.5% | - | - |
| 2025-05-01 | $2.25 | $2.21 | +1.8% | - | - |
Previous ED editions
Get the institutional verdict on ED
Seven-seat 21-ERT council. Pre-print forecast signed before the earnings release. Post-print grade, published in public. Every verdict sealed with a cryptographic receipt.
Read the ED verdict at Gamma QCVerify authenticity
Every Gamma QC verdict is signed with a cryptographic receipt at issuance. Independently verify any published verdict at attest.gammaqc.com. This educational primer is content-only and not itself signed; the institutional verdict at the link above is.