Business profile & competitive position
Consolidated Edison, Inc. is classified in the Utilities sector, specifically the Regulated Electric industry. In plain terms, it earns its keep by owning and operating electricity transmission and distribution assets within a defined service territory and collecting rates set or approved by regulators. Unlike a merchant generator that profits from volatile wholesale power prices, a regulated electric utility’s core economics are anchored to a regulatory bargain: it accepts a capped return in exchange for a legal monopoly over the wires business.
The numbers in the current snapshot fit that model. Return on equity is 8.9% and net margin is 12.5%. Those are not the metrics of a high-growth, wide-moat compounder; they are exactly the kind of modest, permissioned returns that regulators typically allow in rate cases. An 8.9% ROE suggests the utility is earning something close to an authorized cost-of-equity band rather than capturing excess economic rents. The 12.5% net margin reflects cost-recovery mechanisms—fuel adjustments, riders, and base-rate filings—rather than brand-driven pricing power. Add in a beta of 0.26 and the competitive story is stability, not disruption: the “moat” is the franchise, the capital intensity of the grid, and the regulatory process itself.
Financial posture
Consolidated Edison currently carries a market capitalization of $39.2 billion and trades at a price-to-earnings ratio of 17.4. At $106.435 per share, the stock also sits below its 50-day exponential moving average of $109.75, while the relative strength index reads 37.1. Those technical markers do not tell a trend story by themselves, but they do describe a stock that has recently underperformed its own short-term average.
The valuation math is consistent with a regulated utility. A 17.4 P/E on a 12.5% net margin and an 8.9% ROE implies the market is paying for predictable cash flows rather than rapid earnings expansion. That is supported by the 0.26 beta: the stock’s systematic risk is low relative to the broader equity market, which typically commands a lower earnings yield than more cyclical names. There are no debt figures in the provided snapshot, but the regulated model itself implies a leveraged, rate-base-heavy balance sheet; investors typically evaluate such companies through the lens of allowed return on equity, interest-rate sensitivity, and dividend capacity rather than top-line growth rates.
Macro & geopolitical exposure
Because Consolidated Edison sits in the Regulated Electric industry, its macro exposure is dominated by factors that influence the cost and authorization of capital, not commodity markets. Interest rates are the first and largest macro channel. Regulators set allowed returns partly by referencing benchmark borrowing costs, so higher long-term yields can compress the spread between earned and allowed ROE while also making the stock’s income stream less attractive relative to fixed income.
Inflation is a related risk. Even if a utility can recover fuel and purchased-power costs through riders, there is often a lag before base rates catch up with higher labor, equipment, and construction costs. That is the classic “regulatory lag” problem. The sector is also exposed to policy shifts around decarbonization, grid hardening, and reliability mandates, all of which can increase capital spending and rate-base growth but may also trigger political resistance to rate hikes. Weather events can simultaneously raise repair costs and intensify calls for resilience spending. Currency swings are generally immaterial to a domestic wires business, though trade policy on imported transformers and grid hardware can affect capex timing and cost.
Recent developments
The most recent catalyst was the Q2 2026 earnings report released on Aug. 6, 2026. Zacks.com reported that Consolidated Edison beat both earnings and revenue estimates, while The Wall Street Journal’s same-day headline noted higher profit and revenue. A day later, on Aug. 7, 2026, Zacks.com added that earnings topped estimates and revenues rose year-over-year. The actual figures were crisp: Consolidated Edison reported EPS of $0.83 against a consensus estimate of $0.756, a 9.8% positive surprise.
Despite the beat, the immediate price reaction was slightly negative: the stock fell 0.89% the next session, and the five-day post-earnings drift was 0%. That disconnect is useful for traders to note: an earnings beat does not automatically generate a positive drift, especially in a low-beta, income-oriented sector where results may already be well telegraphed and where sector-wide interest-rate flows can overwhelm single-stock headlines.
Earnings behavior & post-earnings drift
Over the last eight reported quarters, Consolidated Edison has beaten earnings estimates seven times, for a beat rate of 88%. The average earnings surprise across those quarters is 3.9%, and the average five-day post-earnings price move is +1.25%, classified as an “up” drift. That long-run pattern suggests the company has generally delivered operational results that exceed the unofficial consensus.
However, the average hides real variability in the trailing four quarters. On Nov. 6, 2025, a 9.2% beat ($1.90 actual versus $1.74 estimate) drove a 1.58% gain the next day and a 4.08% gain over the following five sessions. By contrast, the Feb. 19, 2026 beat of 4.0% ($0.89 versus $0.856) was met with a 1.89% next-day drop and a 1.04% five-day decline. The May 7, 2026 quarter, the only miss in the recent sequence at -4.8% ($2.17 versus $2.28), produced only a 0.08% one-day dip and a 0.7% five-day recovery. The most recent Aug. 6, 2026 report, as noted, beat by 9.8% yet drifted 0% over five days. Looking ahead, the next scheduled report is Nov. 5, 2026 after the close, with a consensus EPS estimate of $2.04.
Frequently Asked Questions
How often has Consolidated Edison beaten earnings estimates?
Over the last eight reported quarters, ED has beaten estimates seven times, or 88% of the time, with an average earnings surprise of 3.9%.
Why did ED’s stock not rise after the August 2026 earnings beat?
On Aug. 6, 2026, ED reported EPS of $0.83, beating the $0.756 estimate by 9.8%, yet the stock fell 0.89% the next day and posted a 0% five-day drift. This shows that post-earnings price action is not determined by the headline beat alone.
What macro risks are most relevant for a regulated electric utility like ED?
As a Regulated Electric utility, ED is most exposed to interest-rate levels, regulatory lag on cost recovery, inflation in capex and labor, and policy shifts around grid reliability and decarbonization.
For a deeper dive into how analysts and institutions are weighing ED's regulated utility profile, valuation, and earnings track record, explore the full institutional verdict on the stock, which compiles consensus estimates, revision trends, and sector-relative valuation summaries.
| Reported | Actual | Estimate | Surprise | 1D Move | 5D Move |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-06 | $0.83 | $0.756 | +9.8% | -0.89% | null% |
| 2026-05-07 | $2.17 | $2.28 | -4.8% | -0.08% | +0.7% |
| 2026-02-19 | $0.89 | $0.856 | +4% | -1.89% | -1.04% |
| 2025-11-06 | $1.9 | $1.74 | +9.2% | +1.58% | +4.08% |
| 2025-08-07 | $0.67 | $0.641 | +4.5% | - | - |
| 2025-05-01 | $2.25 | $2.21 | +1.8% | - | - |
Previous ED editions
Get the institutional verdict on ED
Seven-seat 21-ERT council. Pre-print forecast signed before the earnings release. Post-print grade, published in public. Every verdict sealed with a cryptographic receipt.
Read the ED verdict at Gamma QCVerify authenticity
Every Gamma QC verdict is signed with a cryptographic receipt at issuance. Independently verify any published verdict at attest.gammaqc.com. This educational primer is content-only and not itself signed; the institutional verdict at the link above is.